Ayoh - Shop now
Buy used:
$80.00
$4.99 delivery June 9 - 13. Details
Or fastest delivery June 3 - 5. Details
Arrives before Father's Day
Used: Very Good | Details
Sold by sequiturbooks
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: 3 volume set. Softcover. Good binding and cover. Clean, unmarked pages. v.1. The First Crusade and the Foundations of the Kingdom of Jerusalem; v.2. The Kingdom of Jerusalem and the Frankish East, 1100-1187; v.3. The Kingdom of Acre and the Later Crusades.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

A History of the Crusades 3 Volume Paperback Set

4.4 out of 5 stars 30 ratings

Sir Steven Runciman's three volume A History of the Crusades, one of the great classics of English historical writing, is now being reissued. Volume I deals completely with the First Crusade and the foundation of the kingdom of Jerusalem. Volume II describes the Frankish states of Outremer from the accession of King Baldwin I to the re-conquest of Jerusalem by Saladin, and in the final volume, Runciman examines the revival of the Frankish kingdom from the time of the Third Crusade until its collapse a century later. The interwoven themes of the book include: Christiandom, the replacement of the cultured Ayubites by the less sympathetic Mameluks as leader of the Moslem world, and the coming of the Mongols. Runciman includes a chapter on architecture and the arts, and an epilogue on the last manifestations of the Crusading spirit.
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more

Editorial Reviews

Review

'I do not know when, in recent years, I have read a book which so enlarged my knowledge of and interest in a period of history … It sets before us one of the formidable moral and romantic epics of our time, with scholarship and imagination worthy of it.' The Times Literary Supplement

'The three volumes ring with battle trumpets and drums, glitter with the splendor of noble parades, and are replete with true stories of bravery and cowardliness, rash daring and wily intrigue … To the specialist [Runicman] offers a wealth of new interpretations … To the layman, he tenders romance and suspense at nearly every page.' The Yale Review

' … the best scholarly survey of the subject by a single author. It will always remain the first considerable work of its kind in the English language.' The English Historical Review

'One of the grand historical monuments of the twentieth century … Written with imagination and based on immense scholarship, [the volumes] are filled with true stories of rash daring and wily intrigue as the flower of Western knighthood assaults the infidel East for God, gold and glory.' Washington Post Book World

Book Description

Sir Steven Runciman's three volume A History of the Crusades, one of the great classics of English historical writing.

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Cambridge University Press
  • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 25, 1987
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 052135997X
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0521359979
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 3.9 pounds
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 5.5 x 3.25 x 8.5 inches
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.4 out of 5 stars 30 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Steven Runciman
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.

Customer reviews

4.4 out of 5 stars
30 global ratings

Review this product

Share your thoughts with other customers

Customers say

Customers find this historical work comprehensive and well-written, with elegant prose that makes it an engaging read. Moreover, they appreciate its beautiful presentation and find it interesting, with one customer noting how it conveys human interest.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

10 customers mention "Depth"10 positive0 negative

Customers appreciate the depth of the book's historical content, particularly its comprehensive coverage of the Crusades, with one customer noting its objective recounting of facts.

"...He was completely objective in his recounting of the facts; he was able to pull off the difficult task of truly bring objective while simultaneously..." Read more

"I first encountered this extraordinary history back in the early '70s as a medieval student and then again some years ago beyond study and therefore..." Read more

"...a great writer and historian and these volumes are filled with interesting stories and details that captivate the reader...." Read more

"...books were written in the '50s but they're still the best for a general history of the Crusades...." Read more

6 customers mention "Writing style"6 positive0 negative

Customers appreciate the writing style of the book, praising its elegant prose, with one customer noting it's a page-turner like a good thriller.

"...irony; and without really knowing how he did it, it was a page turner like a good thriller where you don't know the ending...." Read more

"...also convey the extraordinary complexity of these centuries in a writing style that is at once understandable and also colourful...." Read more

"Runciman is a great writer and historian and these volumes are filled with interesting stories and details that captivate the reader...." Read more

"...Beautifully written in elegant prose, Rucimann summarized centuries of conflict between the two warring faiths; Islam and Christianity." Read more

4 customers mention "Beauty"4 positive0 negative

Customers find the book set beautiful, with one mentioning its colorful illustrations.

"Beautiful books - simply gorgeous. But books are also meant to be read, and I am now halfway through volume 3...." Read more

"...centuries in a writing style that is at once understandable and also colourful...." Read more

"...The set is beautiful, and in wonderful condition." Read more

"Beautiful Set..." Read more

3 customers mention "Interest"3 positive0 negative

Customers find the book interesting, with one mentioning its lively discussion and another noting how it conveys human interest.

"...It was interesting and enlightening for me as I knew little about the crusades...." Read more

"...master of his subject, he is also able to tease out and convey the human interest, the drama and the wrenching saddness of all that was the..." Read more

"Detailed and lively discussion on everything about crusades..." Read more

Not Used-like-New quality
3 out of 5 stars
Not Used-like-New quality
Opened up the box and found that the slip case almost ripped off on one side. The spine of the books were coming detached from the pages. But the pages itself look crisp and unread. I don’t think it quite classifies as “used-like new”
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry, there was an error
Sorry we couldn't load the review

Top reviews from the United States

  • Reviewed in the United States on September 5, 2015
    Beautiful books - simply gorgeous. But books are also meant to be read, and I am now halfway through volume 3. It was interesting and enlightening for me as I knew little about the crusades. My interest start up with the Last of Crysaders - the Knights of John from the Siege of Rhodes onward. But now I have a lot deeper contextual understanding. Depending on your tastes in writing style, it may be a bit too dry and matter-of-fact; and at least for me, it seemed like there were maybe five different names used by the Crusaders and that's it. So you get Raymond hated Raymond but was support by his vessels, Ray one, Ramond and bob. Lol. But I enjoyed the writing. Once I got into the rhythm of it I began to pick up on the writer's dry sense of humor, use of understatement and irony; and without really knowing how he did it, it was a page turner like a good thriller where you don't know the ending. If you just picked a chapter at random and started reading you would reasonably think I am crazy or a shill, but I am definitely not a shill (jury is out on the first one). I actually found out much later that Runciman's Trilogy - this one - was a milestone achievement in the historiography of the crusades. I believe it is still considered one of best of its kind,though certainly more _facts_ must be known now.i doubt the overarching narrative sweep Runciman's created has been altered or bettered. He was completely objective in his recounting of the facts; he was able to pull off the difficult task of truly bring objective while simultaneously bringing out what the crusades were really like and what the crusaders were like as people. I trace all my aced try to various Euopean people and I am astounded that we survived. It is absolutely clear that the vast majority of the people from Europe that "went to save the Holy Land" were vicious, selfish, violent, utterly intolerant and hugely bigoted. Their appetite for slaughter was of such proportions that I have trouble thinking of any other people in history who were consistently so horrifically indifferent to wholes sale murder and Genevieve. I am sure there really ARE other cases like this, but what amazing to me was that over the first three crusades, hundreds of thousands of aristocrats, landless Knights, peasants, and peoples of all walks of left in groups at different times, from different places, and with different cultural makeup. Yet virtually every single army that arrived made the same mistakes, wrought the same havoc, and generally made it seem. As if the west truly WAS. Itching but a wasteland of violence and stupidity. I don't think that is true of course, but I would not blame the Byzantians or Islamic people's for thinking so. Every army from Germany, some as large as 100,000 people - Every single one - could not refrain from pillaging, looting,meaning,ms telling and murdering the local CHRISTIAN population. They could do this at all, mind you, because the Byzantine Emporer gave them permission to cross his lands and did his best to keep the hordes fed and sheltered. There treatment of the Greeks was appalling. Nonetheless, when one of the many groups was ready to move on to the holy land, the Emperor and his advisors gave them all the good counsel possible, provided local guides and current intelligence. Pall this from the empire that had been fighting over Asia Minor for 1000 years. Maybe they knew a thing r two about the terrain, conditions and likely enemy moves? Naturally, as with apparently any advice given by anyone to the westerners, they promptly ignored all the advice, chose terrible routes to march through Anatolia and were destroyed. One particularly stubborn king led his men into a barrow defile that could have had giant neon signs linking (ambush sight!!!!!) at the entrance - this was the place the Emporer had also said to avoid at all costs because once in, if ambushed?0, you were doomed regardless of numbers. None guess as to what the crusaders did. Yep. And the were slaughtered. It really was tragic in so many ways - once the first crusade conquered much of coast from Antioch to Jerusulem, pathetic personal agendas of the crusaders surfaced and there was immediate conflict as everyone scrambled to claim a little kingdom for themselves. It is likely that the Christians spent as much time and energy bickering and posturing with each other than the did with the supposed enemy. It was not very long in fact, before rival Christian lords would have Muslim allies in a battle against another lord with different Muslim allies.

    It is far to simplistic to say that the hostility o the Islamic people's towards the west is directly due to the crusades; but there is abs outlet no doubt that it was a major contributor. When the Christians took Jerusulem, the had sworn oaths to protect certain groups within the city such as the Jews, who they hated but hpoffered great wealth; other wealthy citizens and various other people with dome hope of cutting a deal. After the walls were breached, the army entered the city a began butchering EVERYONE regardless of sex, age, religion, or prior promises. Many groups of Christians, as well as Jews and Muslims would flee to the holy places in hopes that there, at least, these foreigners who came to "liberate the holy city in the name of Jesus would be moved to pity and reverence. Instead, there are several contemporary accounts of the difficulty some of the crusaders turned looters had trying to strip everything o value from the churches, mosques, etc. what wa the difficulty? Primarily finding a way to get out through rooms piled high with the bodies, body parts, and copious amounts of human sides rpthat covered the floors and were piled 6 feet high in places. The people massacred in such places were mostly women, the elderly, children babies and infants. Can you imagine a blood and gore spattered soldier with his bright Red Cross just visible through the filth on his armor as he tried to drag The gold-thread shrouds that had covered images of Jesus and the saints. He was cursing with frustration because the Sirius were heavy and he kept slipping off or plunging into the pile of rated and murdered 10 year olds that happened to bloc the exit? The bodies that were simply hacked to death he would sometimes be able to ge firm footing by crushing the face or skull. Sometimes they were still alive and the screMs were annoying. But it was the ones who had been tortured and so sprawled across the top of a 3 foot high pile of naked young girls, some infants, several young boys, all of which had had ATMs and legs and heads hacked off. Had leaked their insides out through the gaping jagged wound where there vagina used be u til a broadsword had been shoved up it to see if would be long enough to exit through the neck.

    I am not writing these things for simple shock value - it is shocking and sickening and even at the time - which was a fairly brutal world considered the rape of Jerusulem, the holy city of three religions, a city left open and kept safe for Christian pilgrims throughout most every era of the prior Islamic rule - this city, the very goal of the crusades in the first place because the religion of peace supposedly wanted to make sure it was safe for Christians - the destroyed it and committed some of most extensive cruelty and greed and love of killing in history. The Rape if Nanking cones to mind as a good comparison. And it mattered - not all at once, but we in the west were never forgiven for that unprecedented barbarity - and the fact that in most cases, we repeated such scenes again and again (there was some noblemen there who kept their promises and treaties) accelerated the transformation of Muslim culture up in the Middle East to a more bigoted, violent, and merciless perspective.

    The Normans in particular but every type of people's seemed to be ferocious, incredibly brave warriors; but beyond that most of them were naught but greedy, childish, utterly mercenary, and incapable of NOT trying to kill any person or people that had the misfortune of doing something that appeared an affront to the average middle age warrior. There was only one interpretation and only one appropriate response - slaughter. It would not be a stretch to say the vast majority of the crusaders and many of those left behinfpd in Europe with psychotic in every sense of the word.

    Many hundreds of years of benevolent tolerance was destroyed, then reversed by the western world within only a couple hundred years. Before the crusades, Islamic leaders of states with large populations of Christians and other religions - not equality it is true, but with relatively little censure and in some times and places they were even treated equally under the law to a Muslim.

    Sorry to go on so long, but it's a result of the power of the narrative to really absorb the real history. The author pulled no punches when describing Islamic butchers,or breaking of promise, receipt, etc. those occurred too.

    Cannot recommend any higher, and if the price is do-able, get this slipcase set. You won't regret it. I can't remember if this was direct from Amazon or a 3rd party, the condition was exactly as described and the purchasing and shipping went flawlessly.
    11 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on August 2, 2003
    I first encountered this extraordinary history back in the early '70s as a medieval student and then again some years ago beyond study and therefore with considerably more money-at least compared to a student-and I was able to purchase this wonderful set.
    I freely admit not having read the three volumes cover to cover but have parachuted in to various topics within the span of information covered by the set and I can attest to the brilliance of Runciman's writing. He represents the best of historical writing in that he is the undoubted master of his sources and their subject matter but he can also convey the extraordinary complexity of these centuries in a writing style that is at once understandable and also colourful. To my mind he is the best of the best because, as undoubted master of his subject, he is also able to tease out and convey the human interest, the drama and the wrenching saddness of all that was the Crusades.
    Steven Runciman has transcended history as few other historians of any time have been able to do. He has imbued the structure of history with the richness of a night at the opera or theatre-the reader is presented with the panoply of humanness at every turn and I believe this is the true mark of a master's hand.
    22 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on July 10, 2018
    Runciman is a great writer and historian and these volumes are filled with interesting stories and details that captivate the reader. However, his obvious anti-Christian bias does an injustice to the subject at hand. Runciman acknowledges that "The Crusades were launched to save Eastern Christendom from the Moslems." He acknowledges throughout that the Muslim occupation of Christian lands was the impetus for the war. But he concludes that, "There was so much courage and so little honour, so much devotion and so little understanding. High ideals were besmirched by cruelty and greed, enterprise and endurance by a blind and narrow self-righteousness; and the Holy War itself was nothing more than a long act of intolerance in the name of God, which is the sin against the Holy Ghost." Such a conclusion does not follow from the history of events he describes.
    While Runciman accurately describes the politics and betrayals among the Crusaders, his description of the endeavor as having little honour and understanding and typified by cruelty and greed is grossly inaccurate.
    17 people found this helpful
    Report

Top reviews from other countries

  • Amazon Customer
    5.0 out of 5 stars Happy customer!
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 4, 2017
    Fantastic quality product and personal delivery by the seller. Very pleased.
  • Amazon Customer
    5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on December 19, 2016
    great booksand great personal service